Adam's Dream Logos 2.0 - Adam's Closing Logos - Dream Logos Wiki
Advertisement

Background: Sahayog Combines was a Indian company founded in 1970. It became defunct in 2016 due to bankruptcy.

Sahayog Combines Logo Edited

1st Logo

(1976-1984)

Logo: A news-like bumper plays with shots of their films, and then the Palace Video jingle is heard.

FX/SFX: The bumper, and the logo transition.

Cheesy Factor: Black Rock Shooter wasn't introduced until the 21st Century, which makes this a laughable logo.

Variant: The logo's font is changed, and the logo is more brighter.

Music/Sounds: The bumper music, then fades into the Palace Video jingle.

Availability: Preserved on some of their films.

Scare Factor: None. It's just so laughable because of the logo.

2nd Logo

(1984-1989)

Nicknames: "Balakrishna and Manish's Ancestor" "Insane Black Rock Shooter"

Msc-1

Logo: TBA.

Variant: On some of their movies, they add the name of the company, but due to the darkness, it can be barely seen.

FX/SFX: Behaving as the last logo, but with the fire moving.

Cheesy Factor: None. Music/Sounds: An deep male announcer speaking a religious phrase on Hindi for 1, 1:30 or 2 minutes, depending on the genre used.

Availability: Rare.

Scare Factor: Nightmare.

3rd Logo

(1989-1995)

Nicknames: "Sad.", TBA

Msc-2

Logo: TBA

FX/SFX: The smoke.

Cheesy Factor: TBA.

Music/Sounds: An less deep announcer speaking a religious phrase in Hindi, along with low beeps repeating every barely-milisecond.

Availability: Uncommon. Seen on their films from the time.

Scare Factor: Medium to nightmare.

4th Logo

(1995-2015)

Msc-3

Logo: TBA

Variant: TBA

FX/SFX: BRS's hair being blown by the wind.

Cheesy Factor: TBA

Music/Sounds: TBA

Availability: Seen on Chail, and other films for the time.

Scare Factor: Low, bordering on medium to nightmare for both variants.

NOTE: Sahayog Combines has been put all of it's logos to nightmare. Years later (or when Sahayog was still producing films): Aadamee Pictures, El Cellón Pictures and Legitimate Production, Inc. would have the same behaviour as this.

Advertisement